Uncle Sam Wants You to Join the Mining Industry

As the United States rushes to develop domestic supplies of critical minerals—the coveted resources powering the energy transition—Washington is finding that a major talent squeeze could complicate its mining ambitions. 

The resources in question—which include minerals such as lithium and copper as well as the powerful rare earth elements—are key components of both clean energy technologies and advanced weapons systems. China overwhelmingly commands the processing and refining of many of those materials, a dominance that has worried U.S. lawmakers and accelerated U.S. efforts to forge new global mineral partnerships and harness domestic resource riches.

But the United States may not have the talent pipelines to realize those ambitions, as large percentages of the current mining workforce prepare to retire and fewer people choose to enter the industry. At the same time as almost half of all mining engineers are estimated to reach retirement age over the next decade, U.S. mining graduations have plummeted by 39 percent in the last eight years. 

And it’s not just Washington that is grappling with these challenges, either; other Western mining giants, including Canada and Australia, are also facing similar labor crunches.

“We’re losing mine workers at a time when we really need to be ramping up mineral production,” said Kray Luxbacher, the head of the Mining and Geological Engineering department at the University of Arizona. “The scope is pretty massive.”

The U.S. mining workforce has already shrunk by 20.4 percent in the last decade, according to Deloitte. At the university level, the United States’ 14 mining schools have collectively graduated roughly 185 to 200 mining engineers per year, into an annual demand of 400 to 500, over the last few years, said Stephen Enders, head of the mining engineering department at the Colorado School of Mines. 

“Professionally, we just don’t have the student numbers in our mining-related university programs to meet the demand of the current needs for the industry,” he said. 

That shortfall is already straining the sector. Last year, 71 percent of mining leaders reported that the talent shortage has impeded production targets and strategic objectives, according to McKinsey, while 86 percent said they faced greater difficulties in recruiting and retaining workers. “Mining is not currently an aspirational industry for young technical talent to join,” the company said in a report. 

The decline of the U.S. mining industry stretches back to the 1970s, as outrage grew over the sector’s environmental harms and many companies struggled to stay economically afloat. The sector has a fraught history and dirty reputation, with well-documented impacts of environmental devastation, pollution, economic exploitation, and lasting health ramifications for miners and neighboring communities.

It was at that time that U.S. lawmakers began viewing mining as an activity that could—and should—be outsourced internationally. Between 1979 and 1983, domestic metals mining shrunk from an $8.9 billion to a $5.9 billion enterprise, according to a 1984 Business Week article titled “The Death of Mining.” The mining workforce also withered, plummeting from 109,000 people in 1981 to just 44,800 people just over two years later.

“The death of mining wasn’t just because of the struggles of the mining operation,” Enders said at an event on Capitol Hill last month. “It was a geopolitical view in the United States at that time that the minerals can come from somebody else’s backyard.”

“Forty years later, the paradigm has shifted back,” he said. 

Today in Washington, where concerns about Beijing’s supply-chain grip run deep, many U.S. lawmakers are intent on building out domestic mining capacity—and finding enough people to take part. While China boasted some 1.4 million mining students in the 2022 academic year, only 600 students were enrolled in accredited undergraduate and graduate mining programs across the United States over the same time period, Rep. Pete Stauber said at a hearing last year. 

“There’s a serious need to strengthen our mining workforce,” Stauber said. “If we don’t take swift action to reverse this trend, there will be no way for American-made mineral supply chains to meaningfully compete on our world stage.”

To boost those numbers, U.S. lawmakers last year introduced bipartisan legislation, the Mining Schools Act of 2023, which would allocate some $10 million per year, from 2024 to 2031, into a grant program for mining schools to recruit new students and conduct research. The bill, which is co-sponsored by 14 senators, would also establish an advisory board to help evaluate those grant applications. 

“It is vital that we grow and train the next generation of miners who will help provide the resources needed to develop the energy technologies of the future,” U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin, chair of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, said in a statement last September when the bill passed out of committee. “Our country can mine and produce our resources cleaner than anywhere else in the world, and this legislation will help ensure that we can continue to do so by investing in mining programs and projects at schools nationwide.”

Alongside these investments, mining schools across the United States have ramped up outreach and recruitment efforts to attract new talent. Industry leaders have also expanded efforts to broaden awareness of the potential career paths in the sector and unveiled new green pledges. 

“We recruit students one at a time. We spend a lot of time with an interested student,” Luxbacher said. “I would happily spend an hour with an interested student in my office, just explaining the kinds of careers that we have, where you can live.” But despite their best efforts, the industry’s reputation, as well as the tendency for the public to conflate metals mining with coal mining, may continue to weigh on prospective students’ decisions. 

There is an “antiquated public perception of the mining industry and what mining does and how it operates,” said Chris Keane, the director of Geoscience Profession and Higher Education at the American Geosciences Institute. “The million-dollar question for the industry is: How do they get people to change their attitude about mining?” he said. 

And no matter how much money lawmakers throw at the problem, it will likely take decades to see results. 

While Washington is making new investments, the “problem when you’re talking about workforce development is that’s a generational skill problem,” Keane said. “So the investments that go today are going to only bear fruit in 15 to 20 years.”